Skip to main content

A DD4T.net Implementation - Custom Binary Publisher

The default way to publish binaries in DD4T is implemented in class DD4T.Templates.Base.Utils.BinaryPublisher and uses method RenderedItem.AddBinary(Component). This produces binaries that have their TCM URI as suffix in their filename. In my recent project, we had a requirement that binary file names should be clean (without the TCM URI suffix). Therefore, it was time to modify the way DD4T was publishing binaries.

The method in charge with publishing binaries is called PublishItem and is defined in class BinaryPublisher. I therefore extended the BinaryPublisher and overrode method PublishItem.

public class CustomBinaryPublisher : BinaryPublisher
{
    private Template currentTemplate;
    private TcmUri structureGroupUri;

In its simplest form, method PublishItem just takes the item and passes it to the AddBinary. In order to accomplish the requirement, we must specify a filename while publishing. This is the file name part of the binary path of Component.BinaryContent.Filename.

In case there is a Structure Group specified, we use the AddBinary method that takes this into account.

protected override void PublishItem(Item item, TcmUri itemUri)
{
    string url;
    Stream stream = item.GetAsStream();
    RenderedItem renderedItem = engine.PublishingContext.RenderedItem;
    Component component = engine.GetObject(item.Properties["TCMURI"]) as Component;
    BinaryContent binaryContent = component.BinaryContent;
    string mimeType = binaryContent.MultimediaType.MimeType;
    string fileName = Path.GetFileName(binaryContent.Filename);

    if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(structureGroupUri))
    {
        url = renderedItem.AddBinary(stream, fileName, string.Empty, component, mimeType).Url;
    }
    else
    {
        StructureGroup structureGroup = engine.GetObject(structureGroupUri) as StructureGroup;
        url = renderedItem.AddBinary(stream, fileName, structureGroup, string.Empty, component, mimeType).Url;
    }

    item.Properties["PublishedPath"] = url;
}

A word of caution: the code above causes publishing to fail in case there are more than one Multimedia Components that contain a binary with the same name. This is because publishing the two Multimedia Components would in face result in the binaries being overwritten on disk.

The error will show up as "Phase: Deployment Prepare Commit Phase failed. Unable to prepare transaction" in the Publishing Queue. On a closer inspection, the core log on the Deployer side will show error "ProcessingException: Attempting to deploy a binary xxx to a location where a different binary is already stored Existing binary: yyy", which means exactly that -- a binary with id yyy is already published with the same name and in the same location as binary with id xxx currently being deployed.

However, this might not be an issue, if all Multimedia Components in the system have different file names (i.e. different binary file names).

The current custom binary publisher is however not used in this way. In a follow-up post, I will present a way to call the PublishItem method from a Template Building Block (TBB).



Comments

Unknown said…
Merkur Slots Machines - SEGATIC PLAY - Singapore
Merkur Slot Machines. 5 star 1xbet 먹튀 rating. The Merkur poormansguidetocasinogambling Casino game was novcasino the first to feature video slots 출장안마 in the entire casino, https://septcasino.com/review/merit-casino/

Popular posts from this blog

Scaling Policies

This post is part of a bigger topic Autoscaling Publishers in AWS . In a previous post we talked about the Auto Scaling Groups , but we didn't go into details on the Scaling Policies. This is the purpose of this blog post. As defined earlier, the Scaling Policies define the rules according to which the group size is increased or decreased. These rules are based on instance metrics (e.g. CPU), CloudWatch custom metrics, or even CloudWatch alarms and their states and values. We defined a Scaling Policy with Steps, called 'increase_group_size', which is triggered first by the CloudWatch Alarm 'Publish_Alarm' defined earlier. Also depending on the size of the monitored CloudWatch custom metric 'Waiting for Publish', the Scaling Policy with Steps can add a difference number of instances to the group. The scaling policy sets the number of instances in group to 1 if there are between 1000 and 2000 items Waiting for Publish in the queue. It also sets the

Toolkit - Dynamic Content Queries

This post if part of a series about the  File System Toolkit  - a custom content delivery API for SDL Tridion. This post presents the Dynamic Content Query capability. The requirements for the Toolkit API are that it should be able to provide CustomMeta queries, pagination, and sorting -- all on the file system, without the use third party tools (database, search engines, indexers, etc). Therefore I had to implement a simple database engine and indexer -- which is described in more detail in post Writing My Own Database Engine . The querying logic does not make use of cache. This means the query logic is executed every time. When models are requested, the models are however retrieved using the ModelFactory and those are cached. Query Class This is the main class for dynamic content queries. It is the entry point into the execution logic of a query. The class takes as parameter a Criterion (presented below) which triggers the execution of query in all sub-criteria of a Criterio

Running sp_updatestats on AWS RDS database

Part of the maintenance tasks that I perform on a MSSQL Content Manager database is to run stored procedure sp_updatestats . exec sp_updatestats However, that is not supported on an AWS RDS instance. The error message below indicates that only the sa  account can perform this: Msg 15247 , Level 16 , State 1 , Procedure sp_updatestats, Line 15 [Batch Start Line 0 ] User does not have permission to perform this action. Instead there are several posts that suggest using UPDATE STATISTICS instead: https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/145982/sp-updatestats-vs-update-statistics I stumbled upon the following post from 2008 (!!!), https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/186e3db0-fe37-4c31-b017-8e7c24d19697/spupdatestats-fails-to-run-with-permission-error-under-dbopriveleged-user , which describes a way to wrap the call to sp_updatestats and execute it under a different user: create procedure dbo.sp_updstats with execute as 'dbo' as