Skip to main content

Demystifying Workflow, Blueprint, Publish and Actions You Can do With Such Items

I was playing around a while ago with some Components in Workflow, in Blueprinted situation, when I noticed some strange behaviour.

I was trying to place a v0.x Component (in Workflow) on a Page in a child Publication -- can't do.
I was publishing a Component linking to a Component in Workflow. It works, but it will use the values from the last saved 'link-to' Component -- makes sense. But even when publishing with ActivateBlueprint=true, still the last major version of the 'link-to' Component was used.

This all triggered me to summarize these weird cases, as follows:

  • A _new_ Component (version 0.x) in workflow:
    • is visible in its own and child Publications (GUI & API);
    • can be published in its own and/or child Publication (GUI & API using the “ActivateWorkflow” flag). Publishing follows most of the rules we know (DCPs get published, Page republished if published previously), but some don’t actually work as expected: Components “linking-to” the Component in workflow will see the ‘last checked-in’ version of the Component in workflow;
    • can be put on a Page as CP:
      • in its own Publication – (GUI & API);
      • in child Publication – only API (because minor version new Component is not visible in GUI’s CP selector);
  • An _existing_ Component does all the above (it can even be put on a Page in a child Publication both in GUI and API)

Note: Be careful with the implications of placing a v0.x of a Component on a Page: you are responsible for cleaning up the Page (remove CP, unpublish Page, delete Page), in case you reject the Component (or if you abort the Workflow Process). If you don't, then Tridion will throw an error that the Component is used and cannot be deleted -- which makes perfect sense...


Nivlong said…
Context matters! Minor component versions not being available for pages CPs is seemingly subtle, but significant behavior. It makes sense, though. As a content author, I'd expect to see the last approved version of a component. Thanks for clarifying, Mihai--great post!

I imagine that clean up step gets more complicated the more we add to the page or link components. Deleting a "used" item aint easy!
Unknown said…
can we publish the minor version(v0.x) of Component only in workflow. when i tried it was not publishing, it is publishing only the major version of the component. please let me know if it is possible to publish minor version.
Mihai Cădariu said…
Yes, Sunil. It is possible. In the GUI, you have to publish the minor version Component from the workflow screens (or in Tridion 2013, with publish option "If possible, publish the in-workflow version of an item").

Using the TOM API, you will need to publish with a ResolveInstruction that has property IncludeWorkflow set to true.

Popular posts from this blog

A Implementation - Custom Binary Publisher

The default way to publish binaries in DD4T is implemented in class DD4T.Templates.Base.Utils.BinaryPublisher and uses method RenderedItem.AddBinary(Component) . This produces binaries that have their TCM URI as suffix in their filename. In my recent project, we had a requirement that binary file names should be clean (without the TCM URI suffix). Therefore, it was time to modify the way DD4T was publishing binaries. The method in charge with publishing binaries is called PublishItem and is defined in class BinaryPublisher . I therefore extended the BinaryPublisher and overrode method PublishItem. public class CustomBinaryPublisher : BinaryPublisher { private Template currentTemplate; private TcmUri structureGroupUri; In its simplest form, method PublishItem just takes the item and passes it to the AddBinary. In order to accomplish the requirement, we must specify a filename while publishing. This is the file name part of the binary path of Component.BinaryConten

Event System to Create Mapped Structure Groups for Binary Publish

As a continuation of last week's Publish Binaries to Mapped Structure Group , this week's TBB is in fact the Event System part of that solution. Make sure you do check out the previous post first, which explains why and what this Event System does. To reiterate, the Event System intercepts a Multimedia Component save, take its Folder path and create a 1-to-1 mapping of Structure Groups. The original code was written, again, by my colleague Eric Huiza : [ TcmExtension ( "MyEvents" )] public class EventsManager  : TcmExtension {     private Configuration configuration;     private readonly Regex SAFE_DIRNAME_REGEX = new Regex ( @"[\W_]+" );     public EventsManager() {         ExeConfigurationFileMap fileMap = new ExeConfigurationFileMap ();         fileMap.ExeConfigFilename = Path .GetDirectoryName( Assembly .GetExecutingAssembly().Location) + "\\EventSystem.config" ;         configuration = ConfigurationManager

Running sp_updatestats on AWS RDS database

Part of the maintenance tasks that I perform on a MSSQL Content Manager database is to run stored procedure sp_updatestats . exec sp_updatestats However, that is not supported on an AWS RDS instance. The error message below indicates that only the sa  account can perform this: Msg 15247 , Level 16 , State 1 , Procedure sp_updatestats, Line 15 [Batch Start Line 0 ] User does not have permission to perform this action. Instead there are several posts that suggest using UPDATE STATISTICS instead: I stumbled upon the following post from 2008 (!!!), , which describes a way to wrap the call to sp_updatestats and execute it under a different user: create procedure dbo.sp_updstats with execute as 'dbo' as