Skip to main content

Publishing from Template Code Using an Impersonated User

This topic touches on hot Tridion practices, both of them debatable:
  • Publishing from Template code;
  • Impersonating a user in Template code;

I won't go into the debate (maybe I'll write about it at a later stage). I will just say that I don't find it bad practice to impersonate in templates, hence the code and topic below.

The use case for "publishing from template code" comes mainly when dealing with Multimedia Components that need to be published also as Dynamic Component Presentations (DCPs). If they weren't publish from template code, you would either have to publish them manually or from some event system. I think both alternatives are clumsy and less suitable than the publish from template code.

So, my requirement is to issue a Publish on a given Tridion item from template code. The publish should have the same properties as the original item (the one currently being rendered by templates). So, the same target, user, and priority.

First, we need to retrieve the "Current Publish Transaction". As I mentioned in my earlier post, this is not possible in Tridion 2011SP1 using the API. Rather, you can use the little hack I presented in "Get Current Publish Transaction". Once we have the PublishTransaction, we can use the properties .Creator and .PublishPriority to get the user and priority, respectively.

Additionally, in order to retrieve the current PublicationTarget, we can use engine.PublishingContext.PublicationTarget.

public void Publish(Engine engine, String tcmUri, User user, PublishPriority priority)
{
    Session session = new Session(user.Title);

    PublishInstruction publishInstruction = new PublishInstruction(session);
    RenderInstruction renderInstruction = new RenderInstruction(session);
    renderInstruction.RenderMode = RenderMode.Publish; // work around. needs to be specified for binaries.
    publishInstruction.RenderInstruction = renderInstruction;

    List<IdentifiableObject> items = new List<IdentifiableObject>() { session.GetObject(tcmUri) };
    List<PublicationTarget> targets = new List<PublicationTarget>() { engine.PublishingContext.PublicationTarget };
    PublishEngine.Publish(items, publishInstruction, targets, priority);

    session.Dispose();
}

Note: the code above is not production ready, rather it is just an example. It is not checking whether the render mode is Publish or Preview. Also, for performance reasons, it should check whether the binary has already been queued up for publishing, and if so, then don't queue it again.

Using the code-above is rather simple:

    PublishTransaction currentTransaction = TemplateUtils.GetPublishTransaction(engine);
    TemplateUtils.Publish(engine, itemUri, currentTransaction.Creator, currentTransaction.Priority);

The trick when publishing with an impersonated user is to create the PublishInstruction and RenderInstruction using the impersonated Session. Additionally, the item to publish has to be also retrieved with the impersonated Session.

Finally, in order for the impersonation to work from template code, the SYSTEM user has to be allowed to impersonate in Tridion. The reason for this is the user executing the template code is by default the SYSTEM user (i.e. the user running the Tridion Content Manager Publisher service).

Open the SDL Tridion Content Manager configuration MMC snap-in and expand nodes SDL Tridion Content Manager / Impersonation Users. Add impersonation user NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM with user type Windows.

Shutdown COM+ application SDL Tridion Content Manager under Component Services / Computers / My Computer / COM+ Applications. Restart Transport and Publisher services.

Comments

Frank said…
> If [the multimedia DCPs] weren't publish from template code, you would either have to publish them manually or from some event system.

No. You would have to publish them from a custom resolver. Custom resolvers allow you to augment Tridion's built-in resolving logic of what else gets published when the user publishes "item A". Using a customer resolver solves the need for these stacked hacks.

The only reason you are doing this from a TBB is because you have never written a resolver yet (OK, maybe also because a custom TBB is easier to deploy). But write a resolver to accomplish this once and you'll realize that it is the right way to accomplish what you need here.

Popular posts from this blog

Scaling Policies

This post is part of a bigger topic Autoscaling Publishers in AWS . In a previous post we talked about the Auto Scaling Groups , but we didn't go into details on the Scaling Policies. This is the purpose of this blog post. As defined earlier, the Scaling Policies define the rules according to which the group size is increased or decreased. These rules are based on instance metrics (e.g. CPU), CloudWatch custom metrics, or even CloudWatch alarms and their states and values. We defined a Scaling Policy with Steps, called 'increase_group_size', which is triggered first by the CloudWatch Alarm 'Publish_Alarm' defined earlier. Also depending on the size of the monitored CloudWatch custom metric 'Waiting for Publish', the Scaling Policy with Steps can add a difference number of instances to the group. The scaling policy sets the number of instances in group to 1 if there are between 1000 and 2000 items Waiting for Publish in the queue. It also sets the

Running sp_updatestats on AWS RDS database

Part of the maintenance tasks that I perform on a MSSQL Content Manager database is to run stored procedure sp_updatestats . exec sp_updatestats However, that is not supported on an AWS RDS instance. The error message below indicates that only the sa  account can perform this: Msg 15247 , Level 16 , State 1 , Procedure sp_updatestats, Line 15 [Batch Start Line 0 ] User does not have permission to perform this action. Instead there are several posts that suggest using UPDATE STATISTICS instead: https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/145982/sp-updatestats-vs-update-statistics I stumbled upon the following post from 2008 (!!!), https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/186e3db0-fe37-4c31-b017-8e7c24d19697/spupdatestats-fails-to-run-with-permission-error-under-dbopriveleged-user , which describes a way to wrap the call to sp_updatestats and execute it under a different user: create procedure dbo.sp_updstats with execute as 'dbo' as

Toolkit - Dynamic Content Queries

This post if part of a series about the  File System Toolkit  - a custom content delivery API for SDL Tridion. This post presents the Dynamic Content Query capability. The requirements for the Toolkit API are that it should be able to provide CustomMeta queries, pagination, and sorting -- all on the file system, without the use third party tools (database, search engines, indexers, etc). Therefore I had to implement a simple database engine and indexer -- which is described in more detail in post Writing My Own Database Engine . The querying logic does not make use of cache. This means the query logic is executed every time. When models are requested, the models are however retrieved using the ModelFactory and those are cached. Query Class This is the main class for dynamic content queries. It is the entry point into the execution logic of a query. The class takes as parameter a Criterion (presented below) which triggers the execution of query in all sub-criteria of a Criterio