Skip to main content

Why Copy-Pasting your Schemas Is Not a Good Idea

Image
By
I just noticed something concerning -- I copy-pasted a Schema in Tridion 2011 SP1 HR1 and I noticed the UUID namespace of it did not change. In fact I ended up with two different Schemas having the exact same namespace.

So far, I have not found a case where that breaks, but it not look good to me (i.e. that UUID seems like it was put in place for a reason).

For me, the root nodes of the two Schemas are not the same, but some of the fields are. I believe there can be a clash there.

Still thinking for a use case where that breaks...


Labels:

Comments

ingmaru said…
Will be a PITA if you are making use of XSLT templating :) for Compound it's not going to bother you :)
06 November, 2012 08:59
Peter Kjaer said…
This is a good example of a default value setting expectations.
In this case, the wrong expectations. The target namespace does not have to be unique and it shouldn't be changed automatically when you make a copy.

My guess is that the default value is unique mostly because we didn't think people would want it to be a tridion.com URL. And since you need the target namespace to have a valid XSD, it must have a value from the very beginning. You can't wait for the user to enter a value.

Speaking of the target namespace: it really should have been added long ago as a field on the General tab.
06 November, 2012 09:41
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Scaling Policies

By
This post is part of a bigger topic Autoscaling Publishers in AWS . In a previous post we talked about the Auto Scaling Groups , but we didn't go into details on the Scaling Policies. This is the purpose of this blog post. As defined earlier, the Scaling Policies define the rules according to which the group size is increased or decreased. These rules are based on instance metrics (e.g. CPU), CloudWatch custom metrics, or even CloudWatch alarms and their states and values. We defined a Scaling Policy with Steps, called 'increase_group_size', which is triggered first by the CloudWatch Alarm 'Publish_Alarm' defined earlier. Also depending on the size of the monitored CloudWatch custom metric 'Waiting for Publish', the Scaling Policy with Steps can add a difference number of instances to the group. The scaling policy sets the number of instances in group to 1 if there are between 1000 and 2000 items Waiting for Publish in the queue. It also sets the
Post a Comment
Read more

Toolkit - Dynamic Content Queries

By
This post if part of a series about the  File System Toolkit  - a custom content delivery API for SDL Tridion. This post presents the Dynamic Content Query capability. The requirements for the Toolkit API are that it should be able to provide CustomMeta queries, pagination, and sorting -- all on the file system, without the use third party tools (database, search engines, indexers, etc). Therefore I had to implement a simple database engine and indexer -- which is described in more detail in post Writing My Own Database Engine . The querying logic does not make use of cache. This means the query logic is executed every time. When models are requested, the models are however retrieved using the ModelFactory and those are cached. Query Class This is the main class for dynamic content queries. It is the entry point into the execution logic of a query. The class takes as parameter a Criterion (presented below) which triggers the execution of query in all sub-criteria of a Criterio
Post a Comment
Read more

Running sp_updatestats on AWS RDS database

By
Part of the maintenance tasks that I perform on a MSSQL Content Manager database is to run stored procedure sp_updatestats . exec sp_updatestats However, that is not supported on an AWS RDS instance. The error message below indicates that only the sa  account can perform this: Msg 15247 , Level 16 , State 1 , Procedure sp_updatestats, Line 15 [Batch Start Line 0 ] User does not have permission to perform this action. Instead there are several posts that suggest using UPDATE STATISTICS instead: https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/145982/sp-updatestats-vs-update-statistics I stumbled upon the following post from 2008 (!!!), https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/186e3db0-fe37-4c31-b017-8e7c24d19697/spupdatestats-fails-to-run-with-permission-error-under-dbopriveleged-user , which describes a way to wrap the call to sp_updatestats and execute it under a different user: create procedure dbo.sp_updstats with execute as 'dbo' as
1 comment
Read more