Skip to main content

A DD4T.net Implementation - IFieldSet Extension Methods

In my previous post Model Builders, I was presenting a way to build strongly typed models starting from an DD4T IComponent object.

The little bit of code that I will be presenting today is a set of extension methods for the IFieldSet object, as seen in the code below:

    IFieldSet fields = component.Fields;
    IFieldSet metadataFields = component.MetadataFields;
    Device device = new Device(component)
    {
        Brief = fields.ResolveRichText("Brief"),

        Metadata = new Device.DeviceMetadata()
        {
            LegacyId = metadataFields.NumericValue("Legacy_Id"),
            ShortTitle = metadataFields.StringValue("Short_Title"),
            Products = metadataFields.KeywordValues("Products"),
            Status = metadataFields.KeywordValue("Status"),
            RelatedTools = ToolBuilder.Instance.Build(metadataFields.LinkedComponentValues("Related_Tools")),
            UpdateDate = metadataFields.DateTimeValue("Update_Date")
        }
    };


These extension methods make it extremely easy to read values from the field set, without having to make several extra checks like verifying for null values, checking if named field exists among the fields in the set. Moreover, the return values are empty string, 0, min date, etc. The idea is to stay away from null wherever possible. This will make life easier for the future, so we don't have to check for null before every call.

As such there are helper methods to read every kind of IField: string, numeric, date, Component Link and Keyword. Also for convenience, I added a helper method to resolve rich text values.

    public static string StringValue(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null ? string.Empty : StringValues(fieldSet, fieldName).FirstOrDefault<string>() ?? string.Empty;
    }


One nice feature of extension methods is that they can be called on 'null' objects. So even if the fieldSet is null, the extension method is still called, so we can perform the null check inside the extension method, rather than before calling it. The StringValue method returns either empty string if the original string fieldSet is empty, otherwise it delegates the call to StringValues, which returns an IList<string> values or empty list.

    public static IList<string> StringValues(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null || !fieldSet.ContainsKey(fieldName) ? new List<string>() : fieldSet[fieldName].Values;
    }


The StringValues method performs the actual checks for whether there is such named field in the set, and if so, it returns its string values.

All other methods are very similar:

    public static IList<DateTime> DateTimeValues(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null || !fieldSet.ContainsKey(fieldName) ? new List<DateTime>() : fieldSet[fieldName].DateTimeValues;
    }

    public static DateTime DateTimeValue(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null ? default(DateTime) : DateTimeValues(fieldSet, fieldName).FirstOrDefault<DateTime>();
    }

    public static IList<IFieldSet> EmbeddedValues(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null || !fieldSet.ContainsKey(fieldName) ? new List<IFieldSet>() : fieldSet[fieldName].EmbeddedValues;
    }

    public static IFieldSet EmbeddedValue(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null ? null : EmbeddedValues(fieldSet, fieldName).FirstOrDefault<IFieldSet>();
    }

    public static IList<IKeyword> KeywordValues(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null || !fieldSet.ContainsKey(fieldName) ? new List<IKeyword>() : fieldSet[fieldName].Keywords;
    }

    public static IKeyword KeywordValue(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null ? null : KeywordValues(fieldSet, fieldName).FirstOrDefault<IKeyword>();
    }

    public static IList<IComponent> LinkedComponentValues(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null || !fieldSet.ContainsKey(fieldName) ? new List<IComponent>() : fieldSet[fieldName].LinkedComponentValues;
    }

    public static IComponent LinkedComponentValue(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null ? null : LinkedComponentValues(fieldSet, fieldName).FirstOrDefault<IComponent>();
    }

    public static IList<double> NumericValues(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null || !fieldSet.ContainsKey(fieldName) ? new List<double>() : fieldSet[fieldName].NumericValues;
    }

    public static double NumericValue(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return fieldSet == null ? 0 : NumericValues(fieldSet, fieldName).FirstOrDefault<double>();
    }


One method that stands out is the RichTextField extension method. This method makes use of DD4T's RichTextHelper:

    public static IList<string> ResolveRichTexts(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        return StringValues(fieldSet, fieldName).Select(x => x.ResolveRichText().ToString()).ToList();
    }

    public static string ResolveRichText(this IFieldSet fieldSet, string fieldName)
    {
        string value = StringValues(fieldSet, fieldName).FirstOrDefault<string>();
        return value == null ? null : value.ResolveRichText().ToString();
    }




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Running sp_updatestats on AWS RDS database

Part of the maintenance tasks that I perform on a MSSQL Content Manager database is to run stored procedure sp_updatestats . exec sp_updatestats However, that is not supported on an AWS RDS instance. The error message below indicates that only the sa  account can perform this: Msg 15247 , Level 16 , State 1 , Procedure sp_updatestats, Line 15 [Batch Start Line 0 ] User does not have permission to perform this action. Instead there are several posts that suggest using UPDATE STATISTICS instead: https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/145982/sp-updatestats-vs-update-statistics I stumbled upon the following post from 2008 (!!!), https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/186e3db0-fe37-4c31-b017-8e7c24d19697/spupdatestats-fails-to-run-with-permission-error-under-dbopriveleged-user , which describes a way to wrap the call to sp_updatestats and execute it under a different user: create procedure dbo.sp_updstats with execute as 'dbo' as...

REL Standard Tag Library

The RSTL is a library of REL tags providing standard functionality such as iterating collections, conditionals, imports, assignments, XML XSLT transformations, formatting dates, etc. RSTL distributable is available on my Google Code page under  REL Standard Tag Library . Always use the latest JAR . This post describes each RSTL tag in the library explaining its functionality, attributes and providing examples. For understanding the way expressions are evaluated, please read my post about the  Expression Language used by REL Standard Tag Library . <c:choose> / <c:when> / <c:otherwise> Syntax:     <c:choose>         <c:when test="expr1">             Do something         </c:when>         <c:when test="expr2">             Do something else         </c:when...

Publish Binaries to Mapped Structure Groups

Today's TBB of the Week comes from the high demand in the field to publish binary assets to different mapped Structure Groups. By default SDL Tridion offers two ways of publishing binaries: All binaries publish to a folder defined in your Publication properties; All binaries rendered by a given template publish to a folder corresponding to a given Structure Group; In my view, both cases are terrible, over-simplified and not representing a real use-case. Nobody in the field wants all binaries in one folder and nobody separates binary locations by template. Instead, everybody wants a mapping mechanism that takes a binary and publishes it to a given folder, defined by a Structure Group, and this mapping is done using some kind of metadata. More often than not, the metadata is the TCM Folder location of the Multimedia Component. I have seen this implemented numerous times. So the solution to publish binaries to a given location implies finding a mapping from a TCM Folder to a...