Skip to main content

Using Amazon SQS for Out-Scaled Deployers

When a Deployer Receiver receives a transport package, it notifies the Deployer Workers there is 'work' for them to do. This notification can take the form of JMS messages sent using some kinds of queuing mechanism. This post describes the Amazon Simple Queuing Service (SQS) to send these notifications. The Deployer workers receive these messages from SQS and they start deploying/undeploying the package.

In order to setup this notification system, we must first create the SQS queues and configure them across the Deployer Receiver and all Deployer Workers.

Start by creating Standard Queues using all default properties. We need 3 queues (commit, content, and prepare):

Once the SQS queues are in place, we can configure the Deployers to use them in the file deployer-config.xml. Amazon gives us the queues URLs. We need to specify the URL base separately, and then simply name the queues individually, as per below:

    <Queue Default="true" Verbs="Content" Adapter="JMS" Id="mihai-content">
        <Property Name="Workers" Value="16"/>
    <Queue Verbs="Commit,Rollback" Adapter="JMS" Id="mihai-commit">
        <Property Name="Workers" Value="16"/>
    <Queue Verbs="Prepare" Adapter="JMS" Id="mihai-prepare">
        <Property Name="Workers" Value="16"/>

    <Adapter Id="JMS">
        <Property Name="JMSConnectionFactoryBuilderClass"
        <Property Name="JMSUri" Value=""/>
        <Property Name="Username" Value="username"/>
        <Property Name="Password" Value="password"/>
        <Property Name="ReceiveTimeout" Value="200"/>

The properties Username and Password represent the AWS account credentials and they can be found in AWS user security settings.

The property Workers specifies the number of worker threads for each queue. Values that perform best are around 10-20 worker threads. Performance degrades using lower values and there isn't any significant performance gain when using higher values.


Popular posts from this blog

Scaling Policies

This post is part of a bigger topic Autoscaling Publishers in AWS . In a previous post we talked about the Auto Scaling Groups , but we didn't go into details on the Scaling Policies. This is the purpose of this blog post. As defined earlier, the Scaling Policies define the rules according to which the group size is increased or decreased. These rules are based on instance metrics (e.g. CPU), CloudWatch custom metrics, or even CloudWatch alarms and their states and values. We defined a Scaling Policy with Steps, called 'increase_group_size', which is triggered first by the CloudWatch Alarm 'Publish_Alarm' defined earlier. Also depending on the size of the monitored CloudWatch custom metric 'Waiting for Publish', the Scaling Policy with Steps can add a difference number of instances to the group. The scaling policy sets the number of instances in group to 1 if there are between 1000 and 2000 items Waiting for Publish in the queue. It also sets the

Running sp_updatestats on AWS RDS database

Part of the maintenance tasks that I perform on a MSSQL Content Manager database is to run stored procedure sp_updatestats . exec sp_updatestats However, that is not supported on an AWS RDS instance. The error message below indicates that only the sa  account can perform this: Msg 15247 , Level 16 , State 1 , Procedure sp_updatestats, Line 15 [Batch Start Line 0 ] User does not have permission to perform this action. Instead there are several posts that suggest using UPDATE STATISTICS instead: I stumbled upon the following post from 2008 (!!!), , which describes a way to wrap the call to sp_updatestats and execute it under a different user: create procedure dbo.sp_updstats with execute as 'dbo' as

Toolkit - Dynamic Content Queries

This post if part of a series about the  File System Toolkit  - a custom content delivery API for SDL Tridion. This post presents the Dynamic Content Query capability. The requirements for the Toolkit API are that it should be able to provide CustomMeta queries, pagination, and sorting -- all on the file system, without the use third party tools (database, search engines, indexers, etc). Therefore I had to implement a simple database engine and indexer -- which is described in more detail in post Writing My Own Database Engine . The querying logic does not make use of cache. This means the query logic is executed every time. When models are requested, the models are however retrieved using the ModelFactory and those are cached. Query Class This is the main class for dynamic content queries. It is the entry point into the execution logic of a query. The class takes as parameter a Criterion (presented below) which triggers the execution of query in all sub-criteria of a Criterio